Categorizing Wikis
August 5th, 2006
Since I’ve joined the editing of the New Orleans Wiki, I’ve waffled about just how to use categories. I have an initial tendency to use categories almost like tags — listing significant topics contained in the article. Maybe not quite as extensively as I’d use tags, but perhaps still a bit over-enthusiastically, in light of what I’ve recently read in the Wikipedia guidelines.
To my understanding, it comes down to an issue of browsing vs. searching. Since categories work best for browsing for information, they should be used more narrowly and strictly than tags would be. Wikipedia recommends against creating a category with only one article in it, but since the New Orleans Wiki still has so many potential directions to grow, I’m of two minds on this. I have to agree that clicking on a category link and finding only one thing is pretty disappointing and makes a wiki (or any website) look bare, so I guess whenever possible it’s best to look for the most fitting broad category when new territory is forged until there are enough related articles to merit their own. But now and then I think it’s worth bending the rules (and maybe creating a new category is incentive to think about more articles).
I’m still interested in the uses of tagging — such as the folksonomies they create. It might be interesting to see how relationships between articles and topics develop that way, but I haven’t been able to find anything about tagging in wikis. Then again, maybe it’s not really necessary, since articles that cite each other “tag” each other in a sense.
-
Interwiki linking – nifty shortcut »
You can link to articles in other wikis without having to use the whole url. For instance:
Comments (0)[[Wikipedia:New_orleans|New Orleans]]
will send you to http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_orleans. Wikimedia’s Help:Interwiki linking pages has all the sordid details.
UNOP on the New Orleans Wiki
August 3rd, 2006
I posted my Unified New Orleans Plan on the New Orleans Wiki tonight, edited a bit, and with a little more on what’s been happening since. The meeting descriptions could stand some fleshing out, especially since I played hooky on Tuesday to attend a couple Night Out Against Crime events in my area: the Bouligny Riverside-Faubourg Marengo-Faubourg Delachaise Triumvirate, and my own hood, Touro Bouligny. I’m pleased to say that there were no long lines to get in, I didn’t have to put a red dot on anything, and the noise level was quite pleasant.
Anyway, if anyone has an corrections to make or anything to add to the wiki article as the process stumbles along, more editors would be much appreciated (wiki markup instructions if you’ve never done it before). Or leave me a comment and I’ll add it in.
-
New Orleans recovery-related acronyms »
If you can think of any acronyms that could use clearing up for someone not from around here or not deeply involved in the recovery planning process, please add them to the Acronyms page of the New Orleans Wiki.
Comments (2) -
New Orleans Wiki – headings suggestion »
I came across wikipedia’s protocol for creating section headings. They suggest reserving the single-equal sign heading designation (
Comments (0)=Cheese=
) for the page title, and beginning the section headings with double equal signs (==Stinky==
) and so on (===Moldy===
). It not only looks nice to have the page title larger than the section headings (as the formatting is currently designed), but the number of equals signs also translates to the corresponding level of html heading tags, which should help search engines determine the topic of the page. -
New Orleans Public Schools »
I added some information on the Orleans Parish public schools to the wiki last week – mostly registration information, and lists of schools that have opened under the various boards the system has been broken up into. I’d like to include more about the charter systems and how they work, and I’m very interested in experiences people have had with post-K public education as well. Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Comments (2)